AI Policy Radar

    NYC Local Law 144

    The proving ground for algorithmic auditing as a regulatory tool — its enforcement record and audit-quality debates directly inform how impact-assessment duties in Colorado and the EU will play out in practice.

    What it is

    The first US law mandating independent bias audits: employers using automated employment decision tools for NYC hiring must obtain annual bias audits, publish results, and notify candidates.

    Who is affected

    The proving ground for algorithmic auditing as a regulatory tool — its enforcement record and audit-quality debates directly inform how impact-assessment duties in Colorado and the EU will play out in practice.

    Key obligations

    • Annual independent bias audit of AEDTs with published results
    • Advance notice to candidates and employees

    Recent signals

    • 31 August 2026

      California closes its session having sent a slate of AI bills to the Governor

      The 2026 session ended on 31 August with sixteen AI bills passed, including SB 813 on independent safety verification. The Governor has until 30 September to sign or veto.

    • 30 June 2026

      Colorado AI Act takes effect after delayed start

      The first comprehensive US state AI law is now operative — as DOJ's AI Litigation Task Force weighs challenges under the December 2025 preemption executive order.

    • 19 March 2026

      New York RAISE Act frontier-safety duties begin

      New York joins California in requiring large frontier developers to publish safety protocols and report incidents.

    • 1 January 2026

      US state AI law wave: Texas, California and Illinois statutes take effect

      TRAIGA, SB 53 (frontier transparency), AB 2013 (training-data disclosure) and Illinois HB 3773 all become operative on the same day — the broadest single expansion of binding US AI law.

    Related instruments

    ← Back to the AI Policy Radar