Skip to main content
    AI Policy Radar

    NYC Local Law 144

    The proving ground for algorithmic auditing as a regulatory tool — its enforcement record and audit-quality debates directly inform how impact-assessment duties in Colorado and the EU will play out in practice.

    What it is

    The first US law mandating independent bias audits: employers using automated employment decision tools for NYC hiring must obtain annual bias audits, publish results, and notify candidates.

    Who is affected

    The proving ground for algorithmic auditing as a regulatory tool — its enforcement record and audit-quality debates directly inform how impact-assessment duties in Colorado and the EU will play out in practice.

    Key obligations

    • Annual independent bias audit of AEDTs with published results
    • Advance notice to candidates and employees

    Recent signals

    • 30 June 2026

      Colorado AI Act takes effect after delayed start

      The first comprehensive US state AI law is now operative — as DOJ's AI Litigation Task Force weighs challenges under the December 2025 preemption executive order.

    • 19 March 2026

      New York RAISE Act frontier-safety duties begin

      New York joins California in requiring large frontier developers to publish safety protocols and report incidents.

    • 1 January 2026

      US state AI law wave: Texas, California and Illinois statutes take effect

      TRAIGA, SB 53 (frontier transparency), AB 2013 (training-data disclosure) and Illinois HB 3773 all become operative on the same day — the broadest single expansion of binding US AI law.

    • 29 September 2025

      California enacts SB 53, the first US frontier-AI transparency law

      Large frontier developers must publish safety frameworks and report catastrophic-risk incidents — the transparency-first successor to vetoed SB 1047.