US States
Fast-moving patchwork of binding state laws under federal preemption pressure
Regulatory posture
With Washington declining to legislate, states became America's de facto AI regulators: Colorado's duty-of-care regime, Texas's TRAIGA, California's frontier-model transparency law (SB 53) and training-data disclosure rules all took effect in 2026. EO 14365's litigation task force now contests this patchwork, making US compliance a two-front battlefield.
Tracked
- In force10
- Coming into force1
- Proposed / Draft1
- Signals5
Set last reviewed 5 September 2026
Next review 3 October 2026
Tracked instruments
- Connecticut SB 5Connecticut's omnibus AI and online safety law, signed 27 May 2026 and applying from 1 October 2026. It sets disclosure duties for AI subscriptions and AI companions, rul…Frontier AI SafetyEmployment & LaborStandards & Assurance
- California SB 813Passed by the California legislature on 30 August 2026, SB 813 would create a state AI Standards and Safety Commission and a framework for accredited third-party organisa…Frontier AI SafetyStandards & Assurance
- California SB 942Requires large GenAI providers (over 1M monthly users) to offer free AI-detection tools and embed latent provenance disclosures in AI-generated content; AB 853 (2025) del…Standards & AssuranceIP & Copyright
- Colorado AI ActThe first comprehensive US state AI law: developers and deployers of 'high-risk' AI systems in consequential decisions (employment, lending, housing, healthcare) owe a du…Employment & LaborStandards & Assurance
- NY RAISE ActNew York's frontier-model law requires large developers to publish safety protocols and report serious safety incidents, following California's transparency-first templat…Frontier AI Safety
- Texas TRAIGATexas's AI law (effective 1 Jan 2026) takes an intent-based approach: it prohibits developing or deploying AI to unlawfully discriminate, manipulate behavior, or produce …Biometrics & SurveillanceGovernance & Procurement
- California SB 53The first US law regulating frontier AI developers specifically: large developers must publish frontier AI frameworks, report catastrophic-risk safety incidents to the st…Frontier AI Safety
- California AB 2013Requires developers of generative AI systems made available in California to publish documentation of training datasets — sources, whether copyrighted or personal data is…IP & CopyrightData & Privacy
- Illinois HB 3773Amends the Illinois Human Rights Act to prohibit employers from using AI that discriminates in recruitment, hiring, promotion or discipline — including via zip-code proxi…Employment & Labor
- ELVIS ActThe first US law protecting voice against AI cloning: extends right-of-publicity protection to voice likeness and creates liability for distributing AI voice-cloning tool…IP & Copyright
- Utah AI Policy ActAn early, light-touch state law: companies cannot blame generative AI for consumer-protection violations, regulated professions must disclose AI use, and an Office of AI …Standards & AssuranceData & Privacy
- NYC Local Law 144The first US law mandating independent bias audits: employers using automated employment decision tools for NYC hiring must obtain annual bias audits, publish results, an…Employment & LaborStandards & Assurance
Upcoming compliance dates
California — Governor's decision deadline on the 2026 AI bills
Last day for the Governor to sign or veto the AI bills passed at the close of the 2026 session, including SB 813 on independent safety verification. Bills left unsigned at the deadline follow California's default rules rather than lapsing quietly.
Connecticut SB 5 obligations start applying
Public Act 26-15 applies from this date: AI subscription disclosures, AI companion duties, automated employment-decision requirements and frontier-developer whistleblower protections.
Signals
California closes its session having sent a slate of AI bills to the Governor
The 2026 session ended on 31 August with sixteen AI bills passed, including SB 813 on independent safety verification. The Governor has until 30 September to sign or veto.
ContextColorado AI Act takes effect after delayed start
The first comprehensive US state AI law is now operative — as DOJ's AI Litigation Task Force weighs challenges under the December 2025 preemption executive order.
New York RAISE Act frontier-safety duties begin
New York joins California in requiring large frontier developers to publish safety protocols and report incidents.
US state AI law wave: Texas, California and Illinois statutes take effect
TRAIGA, SB 53 (frontier transparency), AB 2013 (training-data disclosure) and Illinois HB 3773 all become operative on the same day — the broadest single expansion of binding US AI law.
California enacts SB 53, the first US frontier-AI transparency law
Large frontier developers must publish safety frameworks and report catastrophic-risk incidents — the transparency-first successor to vetoed SB 1047.