Skip to main content
    AI Policy Radar

    Utah AI Policy Act

    The 'disclosure plus sandbox' model that many lighter-touch states copy — and an early mover on AI companion/mental-health chatbot regulation, one of 2025-26's fastest-growing legislative fronts.

    What it is

    An early, light-touch state law: companies cannot blame generative AI for consumer-protection violations, regulated professions must disclose AI use, and an Office of AI Policy runs a learning-lab/sandbox program. Extended in 2025 with mental-health chatbot rules.

    Who is affected

    The 'disclosure plus sandbox' model that many lighter-touch states copy — and an early mover on AI companion/mental-health chatbot regulation, one of 2025-26's fastest-growing legislative fronts.

    Key obligations

    • Disclose GenAI use on request in consumer interactions; proactive disclosure for regulated professions
    • Mental-health chatbot safeguards (HB 452, 2025)

    Recent signals

    • 30 June 2026

      Colorado AI Act takes effect after delayed start

      The first comprehensive US state AI law is now operative — as DOJ's AI Litigation Task Force weighs challenges under the December 2025 preemption executive order.

    • 19 March 2026

      New York RAISE Act frontier-safety duties begin

      New York joins California in requiring large frontier developers to publish safety protocols and report incidents.

    • 1 January 2026

      US state AI law wave: Texas, California and Illinois statutes take effect

      TRAIGA, SB 53 (frontier transparency), AB 2013 (training-data disclosure) and Illinois HB 3773 all become operative on the same day — the broadest single expansion of binding US AI law.

    • 29 September 2025

      California enacts SB 53, the first US frontier-AI transparency law

      Large frontier developers must publish safety frameworks and report catastrophic-risk incidents — the transparency-first successor to vetoed SB 1047.